/Trump stands by McRaven criticism: Should have captured Osama Bin Laden long before we did

Trump stands by McRaven criticism: Should have captured Osama Bin Laden long before we did

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBroward County official Brenda Snipes submits resignation after criticism Retired lieutenant general tears into Trump over attacks against Navy SEAL: ‘Disgusting’ Senate barrels toward showdown over Trump’s court picks MORE on Monday defended his criticism of retired Navy Adm. William McRaven, repeating his belief the U.S. should have killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden sooner. 

“Of course we should have captured Osama Bin Laden long before we did,” Trump tweeted.

The president repeated his dubious claim that he called for taking out bin Laden in his 2000 book, writing that “President Clinton famously missed his shot,” and accused Pakistan of dropping the ball on finding the 9/11 mastermind despite billions in U.S. aid. 

“Fools!” the president wrote.

He also threatened to cut off support for Afghanistan, where U.S. forces are still fighting in a war 17 years after bin Laden used the country as a base to launch the 9/11 attacks. 

“We no longer pay Pakistan the $Billions because they would take our money and do nothing for us, Bin Laden being a prime example, Afghanistan being another,” the president wrote in a subsequent tweet. “They were just one of many countries that take from the United States without giving anything in return. That’s ENDING!”

 

The comments are one day after Trump escalated his war of words against McRaven, a retired Navy SEAL and special operations commander who oversaw the 2011 raid that killed bin Laden, calling him a “Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonRetired lieutenant general tears into Trump over attacks against Navy SEAL: ‘Disgusting’ Retired admiral who oversaw bin Laden raid doubles down on Trump criticism Trump dismisses criticism from Navy SEAL who led Osama bin Laden mission MORE fan” and an “Obama-backer” who should have gotten to bin Laden faster. 

“Wouldn’t it have been nice if we got Osama bin Laden a lot sooner than that, wouldn’t it have been nice?” Trump said during an interview with Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.” 

Trump’s comments have set off a firestorm of controversy for the president, whose handling of the military has come under fire despite his professed support for the armed forces. 

Republican Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioHillary advisers battle over whether she’ll run in 2020 Rubio defends ‘3 point kick’ analogy: ‘You think everyone who follows politics knows what a field goal is?’ Lawmakers to introduce bipartisan bill targeting China’s treatment of Muslims MORE (Fla.) on Monday praised McRaven, saying his political views were irrelevant to his legacy.  

“I don’t know if Adm. William McRaven shares my political views or not. But I do know that few Americans have sacrificed or risked more than he has to protect America & the freedoms we enjoy,” Rubio tweeted. “His military career exemplified honor & excellence. I am grateful for his service.” 

McRaven first criticized Trump last year, urging the president not to refer to the news media as the “enemy of the people.” The retired admiral stood by those comments on Sunday, saying he believes Trump’s attacks on the media represent “the greatest threat to our democracy in my lifetime.”

“When you undermine the people’s right to a free press and freedom of speech and expression, then you threaten the Constitution and all for which it stands,” he said in a statement to CNN. 

“I did not back Hillary Clinton or anyone else,” McRaven added. “I am a fan of President Obama and President George W. Bush, both of whom I worked for. I admire all presidents, regardless of their political party, who uphold the dignity of the office and who use that office to bring the nation together in challenging times.”

Updated at 11:02 a.m.